Senator DeWine
Senator Voinovich
David Ben-Ariel
Toledo, OH
April 27, 2005
Dear Senator DeWine,
The Israeli embassy informed your office years ago that I wouldn't be "eligible for a visa until 2005."
Here we are - NINE YEARS LATER! Can you believe it? And, God knows, my love of Israel is just as strong, and my innocence just as sure, as they
surely know.
Please use your good office to assist your constituent in obtaining the necessary visa that I may return to visit Israel without complications or detention at the airport due to any unnecessary confusion.
I yearn to return to Zion and truly miss the Holy Land, having lived throughout it, serving on eight kibbutzim, as well as living in Jerusalem, Israel's eternal capital.
Sincerely,
David Ben-Ariel
************
Copies sent to:
• George W. Bush, President
• Mike DeWine, U.S. Senate
• George V. Voinovich, U.S. Senate
• Marcy Kaptur, U.S. House
__________________________
Should an alleged "EXPIRED VISA" put you on a terrorist list? It's because of foolishness like this, going after clearly innocent people, that enable the Arab terrorists to continue to get away with murder.
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Right, Right Back At Ya!
I've decided that this liberal needs to start throwing the same crap at conservatives that they're slinging at us. Yes, I am going to sink to their level because they're winning.
Conservative jackass: We are winning in Iraq and the unsuccessful attacks in London prove that the terrorists are weakened because of it.
Indy: People as dumb as you should not be allowed to breathe.
Honestly, how can anyone have a rational argument with a conservative who is so irrational as to question your motivations, patriotism, manhood or intelligence every time they disagree with you. The next time I'm asked a ludicrous and simple minded question or hear a completely ridiculous statement by one of these ignorant morons I'm going to throw it right back at them.
Conservative dunderhead: The attacks in London are what happens when you don't respond with enough military force.
Indy: Why do you support the terrorists and hate America?
I'm tired of going out and buying books and talking to different people who are close to the heart of different issues to find out what they think and know. From now on I'm going to let my uninformed opinion run free on the open range of the ridiculous. The Indy Voice will no longer reference some "definitive book on the subject," an expert or worse of all, some "fact". From now on I am going to be driving down the crooked conservative road where dribbling and allowing opinion to skew the facts is not only allowed but encouraged.
Conservative idiot: The British, because they are by and large a group of liberal pansies, are not going to respond to these attacks and they're probably going to get hit again.
Indy: Does your momma know that you're a fascist pig?
I've come to the conclusion that where I'm at in life has everything to do with my ability and I'm not going to sit around and listen to the sniveling comments of a bunch of self-righteous, hypocritical, small-minded peons who have as many brain cells as I cleave from my ass when I scratch it.
Conservative dipstick: The British we're just asking for these attacks by having an open society that promotes multi-culturalism.
Indy: Why don't you move to another country since you seem to hate this one so much?
No longer will I travel to the library, the bookstore or pick-up the newspaper because why does any of that matter. I'm going to just ignore all the so-called "facts" and tailor my arguments to appeal to all that is bad in human nature. Hell, that's exactly what the Republicans have been doing for years and they have a lock on the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government not to mention the religious and corporate institutions in this country.
Conservative retard: The U.S. and Britain are fighting an away game against these terrorists so we don't have to fight them here! It is unfortunate that London has been attacked and I offer them my condolences and solidarity.
Indy: I really believe that the Conservatives, and the clergy, and the televangelists, and the segregationists and the greedy capitalists who are actively trying to make that a mainstream lifestyle, the Republican party, Family Research Council—all of them who have tried to theocratize America and Britain—I point the finger in their face and say "you helped this happen."
Conservative jackass: We are winning in Iraq and the unsuccessful attacks in London prove that the terrorists are weakened because of it.
Indy: People as dumb as you should not be allowed to breathe.
Honestly, how can anyone have a rational argument with a conservative who is so irrational as to question your motivations, patriotism, manhood or intelligence every time they disagree with you. The next time I'm asked a ludicrous and simple minded question or hear a completely ridiculous statement by one of these ignorant morons I'm going to throw it right back at them.
Conservative dunderhead: The attacks in London are what happens when you don't respond with enough military force.
Indy: Why do you support the terrorists and hate America?
I'm tired of going out and buying books and talking to different people who are close to the heart of different issues to find out what they think and know. From now on I'm going to let my uninformed opinion run free on the open range of the ridiculous. The Indy Voice will no longer reference some "definitive book on the subject," an expert or worse of all, some "fact". From now on I am going to be driving down the crooked conservative road where dribbling and allowing opinion to skew the facts is not only allowed but encouraged.
Conservative idiot: The British, because they are by and large a group of liberal pansies, are not going to respond to these attacks and they're probably going to get hit again.
Indy: Does your momma know that you're a fascist pig?
I've come to the conclusion that where I'm at in life has everything to do with my ability and I'm not going to sit around and listen to the sniveling comments of a bunch of self-righteous, hypocritical, small-minded peons who have as many brain cells as I cleave from my ass when I scratch it.
Conservative dipstick: The British we're just asking for these attacks by having an open society that promotes multi-culturalism.
Indy: Why don't you move to another country since you seem to hate this one so much?
No longer will I travel to the library, the bookstore or pick-up the newspaper because why does any of that matter. I'm going to just ignore all the so-called "facts" and tailor my arguments to appeal to all that is bad in human nature. Hell, that's exactly what the Republicans have been doing for years and they have a lock on the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government not to mention the religious and corporate institutions in this country.
Conservative retard: The U.S. and Britain are fighting an away game against these terrorists so we don't have to fight them here! It is unfortunate that London has been attacked and I offer them my condolences and solidarity.
Indy: I really believe that the Conservatives, and the clergy, and the televangelists, and the segregationists and the greedy capitalists who are actively trying to make that a mainstream lifestyle, the Republican party, Family Research Council—all of them who have tried to theocratize America and Britain—I point the finger in their face and say "you helped this happen."
Aid for Africa?
Why, after all these years, are so many countries in Africa still dependent upon Western aid? Has such aid truly helped the situation or
encouraged them to let others do for them what they won't do for themselves? (As the saying goes, you can give a man a fish and he'll eat
once or you can teach him how to fish and he'll eat plenty of times). Has such assistance truly served the long-term interests of Africa or merely
the self-interests of burgeoning bureaucracies?
Why does the white world of the West seem more concerned for the welfare and security of Africans than do many of Africa's tyrannical leaders? I
raise this question because the West is usually despised as former colonialists and imperialists and is no longer welcome to rule with its
law and order but is begged to bail African countries out once their
elected leaders rip them off (bloating foreign bank accounts) and strip their countries bare by grievous mismanagement.
Productive white farmers in Zimbabwe, for example, have viciously been driven off their family farms for black squatters who do just that - squat
- and the orphaned land lies fallow and the country starves. Yet racist Mugabe's still in power (no visits by Jesse Jackson or by an
African-American coalition of outraged ministers over this reverse discrimination or threats of sanctions by the divided UN).
These are some of the points (sharpened by my own experiences and observations) travel-writer Paul Theroux makes in his work: Dark Star Safari: Overland from Cairo to Cape Town.
I've been blessed to have also visited parts of Africa, having taken trains, planes, and automobiles (hitchhiked for the most part) from
Johannesburg to Cape Town, South Africa, up the Garden Route to Durban, Swaziland, Kruger National Park, and back to Johannesburg, on to Pretoria
and the Voortrekker's National Monument (does it still stand?) while en route to Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe (Rhodesia).
I met up with an English lass on the train in Bulawayo whom I had met near George, South Africa and bunji-jumped with off a bridge weeks before while travelling back to Johannesburg.
I then went to Tel Aviv, Israel before coming to Home Sweet Home(USA).
May God bless Africa with genuine leaders who love their people and who put their people above their personal ambitions and greedy temptations.
encouraged them to let others do for them what they won't do for themselves? (As the saying goes, you can give a man a fish and he'll eat
once or you can teach him how to fish and he'll eat plenty of times). Has such assistance truly served the long-term interests of Africa or merely
the self-interests of burgeoning bureaucracies?
Why does the white world of the West seem more concerned for the welfare and security of Africans than do many of Africa's tyrannical leaders? I
raise this question because the West is usually despised as former colonialists and imperialists and is no longer welcome to rule with its
law and order but is begged to bail African countries out once their
elected leaders rip them off (bloating foreign bank accounts) and strip their countries bare by grievous mismanagement.
Productive white farmers in Zimbabwe, for example, have viciously been driven off their family farms for black squatters who do just that - squat
- and the orphaned land lies fallow and the country starves. Yet racist Mugabe's still in power (no visits by Jesse Jackson or by an
African-American coalition of outraged ministers over this reverse discrimination or threats of sanctions by the divided UN).
These are some of the points (sharpened by my own experiences and observations) travel-writer Paul Theroux makes in his work: Dark Star Safari: Overland from Cairo to Cape Town.
I've been blessed to have also visited parts of Africa, having taken trains, planes, and automobiles (hitchhiked for the most part) from
Johannesburg to Cape Town, South Africa, up the Garden Route to Durban, Swaziland, Kruger National Park, and back to Johannesburg, on to Pretoria
and the Voortrekker's National Monument (does it still stand?) while en route to Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe (Rhodesia).
I met up with an English lass on the train in Bulawayo whom I had met near George, South Africa and bunji-jumped with off a bridge weeks before while travelling back to Johannesburg.
I then went to Tel Aviv, Israel before coming to Home Sweet Home(USA).
May God bless Africa with genuine leaders who love their people and who put their people above their personal ambitions and greedy temptations.
Israel's Unjust Deportation of David Ben-Ariel
As reported on the front page of the Jerusalem Post (Jan. 8, 1996), the GSS (Israeli Secret Police) sought my deportation for ALLEGED involvement in a plot to "damage the mosques." This travesty of justice occurred during the witch-hunt that followed Prime Minister Rabin's assassination.
The Leftists were exploiting the death of Rabin to squash their legal opposition. Such Stalinist tactics were condemned by former Russian refuseniks and Prisoners of Zion. Thankfully, the regime of Shimon Peres was toppled with the election of Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu.
As a Christian-American member of the Temple Mount Faithful movement, I had been privileged to participate in their legal demonstrations during my 10-month stay in Jerusalem awaiting dual citizenship. Israeli television often showed me with my Jewish friends carrying Israeli flags throughout the Old City. I have also been published in the Jerusalem Post, the Traveller and other publications about the burning issue of the TEMPLE MOUNT. The Temple Mount suffers under a MILITANT MUSLIM OCCUPATION that FORBIDS CHRISTIANS AND JEWS FROM PRAYING OR READING THE BIBLE there.
This despite the fact that both Biblical Temples stood there, and it is the location where Jesus and His disciples taught and prayed. Israel has a law against such violent religious discrimination, but they're afraid or unwilling to enforce it. Such shameful appeasement rewards the Muslim aggressors and punishes the innocent!
The Temple Mount Faithful demands an end to this injustice. Meanwhile, the Muslim terrorists continue to destroy rich archaeological evidence upon the Temple Mount that proves Jerusalem is Jewish! The world condemned the Muslim Taliban for blowing up a Buddhist idol, yet has remained deathly silent while Judaism's holiest site is desecrated!
In my book, Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall, I've called for the Israeli government to exercise its Biblical responsibility to BUILD THE TEMPLE. I wrote that book in the United States before any of this trouble. It clearly explains that I'm not calling for any individual to remove the mosques, but rather expecting the GOVERNMENT to fulfill their historic obligations (if an "act of God" doesn't solve the problem first).
I mentioned this to the police during my six and a half hours of night-time interrogation by six different men. Later I was imprisoned in Jerusalem's rotting Russian Compound (built by the Turks) for several weeks until my heartbreaking deportation (for highlighting the plight of the Temple Mount).
As my attorney in Israel, Naftali Warzberger, has written, MY FUTURE IS LINKED WITH THE JEWS AND ISRAEL. That is why I'm confident justice will prevail.
Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D. Ohio) persistently presented this case of religious discrimination and political persecution before our State Department that turned a blind eye to the facts. (It's now evident why, since the former Consul General in Jerusalem, Edward G. Abington, Jr., is presently a paid lackey of the terrorist PLO! Talk about a conflict of interests that should be investigated!).
Senator Mike DeWine (R. Ohio) has inquired on my behalf to return to Zion and was informed that the Israeli Ministry of the Interior has made the decision not to grant the visa and does not offer any information behind their decision. They later wrote Senator DeWine that I wouldn't be eligible for a visa until 2005! Now that it's here, I've recently requested Senator DeWine's assistance in obtaining such a visa.
Gershon Salomon, chairman of the Jerusalem-based Temple Mount Faithful, assures me that a change is coming in Israel that will welcome me back and appreciate my efforts on behalf of Israel.
The Leftists were exploiting the death of Rabin to squash their legal opposition. Such Stalinist tactics were condemned by former Russian refuseniks and Prisoners of Zion. Thankfully, the regime of Shimon Peres was toppled with the election of Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu.
As a Christian-American member of the Temple Mount Faithful movement, I had been privileged to participate in their legal demonstrations during my 10-month stay in Jerusalem awaiting dual citizenship. Israeli television often showed me with my Jewish friends carrying Israeli flags throughout the Old City. I have also been published in the Jerusalem Post, the Traveller and other publications about the burning issue of the TEMPLE MOUNT. The Temple Mount suffers under a MILITANT MUSLIM OCCUPATION that FORBIDS CHRISTIANS AND JEWS FROM PRAYING OR READING THE BIBLE there.
This despite the fact that both Biblical Temples stood there, and it is the location where Jesus and His disciples taught and prayed. Israel has a law against such violent religious discrimination, but they're afraid or unwilling to enforce it. Such shameful appeasement rewards the Muslim aggressors and punishes the innocent!
The Temple Mount Faithful demands an end to this injustice. Meanwhile, the Muslim terrorists continue to destroy rich archaeological evidence upon the Temple Mount that proves Jerusalem is Jewish! The world condemned the Muslim Taliban for blowing up a Buddhist idol, yet has remained deathly silent while Judaism's holiest site is desecrated!
In my book, Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall, I've called for the Israeli government to exercise its Biblical responsibility to BUILD THE TEMPLE. I wrote that book in the United States before any of this trouble. It clearly explains that I'm not calling for any individual to remove the mosques, but rather expecting the GOVERNMENT to fulfill their historic obligations (if an "act of God" doesn't solve the problem first).
I mentioned this to the police during my six and a half hours of night-time interrogation by six different men. Later I was imprisoned in Jerusalem's rotting Russian Compound (built by the Turks) for several weeks until my heartbreaking deportation (for highlighting the plight of the Temple Mount).
As my attorney in Israel, Naftali Warzberger, has written, MY FUTURE IS LINKED WITH THE JEWS AND ISRAEL. That is why I'm confident justice will prevail.
Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D. Ohio) persistently presented this case of religious discrimination and political persecution before our State Department that turned a blind eye to the facts. (It's now evident why, since the former Consul General in Jerusalem, Edward G. Abington, Jr., is presently a paid lackey of the terrorist PLO! Talk about a conflict of interests that should be investigated!).
Senator Mike DeWine (R. Ohio) has inquired on my behalf to return to Zion and was informed that the Israeli Ministry of the Interior has made the decision not to grant the visa and does not offer any information behind their decision. They later wrote Senator DeWine that I wouldn't be eligible for a visa until 2005! Now that it's here, I've recently requested Senator DeWine's assistance in obtaining such a visa.
Gershon Salomon, chairman of the Jerusalem-based Temple Mount Faithful, assures me that a change is coming in Israel that will welcome me back and appreciate my efforts on behalf of Israel.
Uniting Americans
Liberals are fretting over who President Bush will nominate to replace a retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. For them the prospect of Justice O’Connor who has only at times been a friend to the Constitution being replaced with a truly qualified Supreme Court Justice is terrifying. She has flirted with liberal ideology enough over her tenure that the left has gone from completely opposed to her to promoting the need to replace her in kind because the mere thought of her replacement being to the “right” of this “moderate” brings them feelings of dread and despair. At least with a “moderate” on the court like Justice O’Connor they can still win victories for their ideology.
So the liberals are out in force calling for a nominee that will unite America. And to be honest, I agree … somewhat.
When liberals talk about “uniting” America they mean someone that is agreeable to all sides be they right or wrong. The problem is however that this isn’t possible. You cannot nominate someone that is acceptable to constitutionalists like my self who seek a nominee that will actually enforce the law and not make law and also someone that at the same time is acceptable to those that want a nominee who will create a new law and then enforce that new law. Sorry, but it just isn’t going to happen.
I don’t find it odd that this is the vain tactic of the left; to call for unity of all ideas no matter how opposed they are to each other. But where was the call from these same elite liberals when a then President Bill Clinton put up for nomination famous rewriter of the Constitution Ruth Bader Ginsberg? I don’t remember them asking Bill Clinton to nominate a Justice that was acceptable to us Constitutionalists and “unite” America. And that is because they didn’t.
But like I said before, I do sort of agree that we need to unite America with Justice O’Connor’s replacement. President Bush should nominate someone that is able to “unite” Americans but realizing that just because people live here and claim citizenship here that they are not necessarily “Americans”.
Forget appeasing the left wing Socialists, fascists & Communists. They are not Americans because they do not agree with the quintessential documents that spell out what “Americans” believe; the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Sure, these Socialists, fascists & Communists will bemoan my bravado at saying they are not Americans. But they aren’t. Sorry.
They don’t believe in “all men … created equal”. They don’t believe that these rights come from their “Creator” and by correlation that there must be a “Creator” (i.e. God). They don’t believe that the powers of the government should be limited to only their enumerated powers and that instead they have carte blanche to do anything they want in the name of promoting “general Welfare”. They believe that there is no right to freely practice religion in America but only a mysterious “separation of church and state” that miraculously prohibits public free exercise and displays of religion. They don’t believe in private property rights and they certainly don’t believe that the American people should be allowed to keep and bear arms to protect themselves from oppressive government. So they certainly cannot call themselves “Americans” since believing in all of the above are integral to what being an “American” is about.
So let’s unite America and the “Americans” that live here with a Justice that will adhere to the Constitution. And let’s forget about the faux Americans cloaking themselves in a veil of false patriotism.
So the liberals are out in force calling for a nominee that will unite America. And to be honest, I agree … somewhat.
When liberals talk about “uniting” America they mean someone that is agreeable to all sides be they right or wrong. The problem is however that this isn’t possible. You cannot nominate someone that is acceptable to constitutionalists like my self who seek a nominee that will actually enforce the law and not make law and also someone that at the same time is acceptable to those that want a nominee who will create a new law and then enforce that new law. Sorry, but it just isn’t going to happen.
I don’t find it odd that this is the vain tactic of the left; to call for unity of all ideas no matter how opposed they are to each other. But where was the call from these same elite liberals when a then President Bill Clinton put up for nomination famous rewriter of the Constitution Ruth Bader Ginsberg? I don’t remember them asking Bill Clinton to nominate a Justice that was acceptable to us Constitutionalists and “unite” America. And that is because they didn’t.
But like I said before, I do sort of agree that we need to unite America with Justice O’Connor’s replacement. President Bush should nominate someone that is able to “unite” Americans but realizing that just because people live here and claim citizenship here that they are not necessarily “Americans”.
Forget appeasing the left wing Socialists, fascists & Communists. They are not Americans because they do not agree with the quintessential documents that spell out what “Americans” believe; the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Sure, these Socialists, fascists & Communists will bemoan my bravado at saying they are not Americans. But they aren’t. Sorry.
They don’t believe in “all men … created equal”. They don’t believe that these rights come from their “Creator” and by correlation that there must be a “Creator” (i.e. God). They don’t believe that the powers of the government should be limited to only their enumerated powers and that instead they have carte blanche to do anything they want in the name of promoting “general Welfare”. They believe that there is no right to freely practice religion in America but only a mysterious “separation of church and state” that miraculously prohibits public free exercise and displays of religion. They don’t believe in private property rights and they certainly don’t believe that the American people should be allowed to keep and bear arms to protect themselves from oppressive government. So they certainly cannot call themselves “Americans” since believing in all of the above are integral to what being an “American” is about.
So let’s unite America and the “Americans” that live here with a Justice that will adhere to the Constitution. And let’s forget about the faux Americans cloaking themselves in a veil of false patriotism.
Peres came to power over Rabin's dead body
I met Yitzhak Rabin in the Israeli Parliament in 1982 during Hanukkah. I was able to talk with him briefly and mention I was associated with Ambassador College in Pasadena, California.
That was a tactful way of saying I'm a Christian since I knew he personally knew Herbert W. Armstrong and the Worldwide Church of God, including the Plain Truth magazine. Mr. Armstrong had presented him with a gift of Steuben crystal before.
I was a volunteer at Kibbutz Ramat Yohanan at the time, in Northern Israel near Haifa. Just so happens Rabin had lived there for over a year in the late '50s.
I initially considered Rabin - born in Jerusalem - a traitor for surrendering too much to sworn Arab enemies who had not changed their goal of genocide, only their tactics; for going against clear security concerns he once expressed. (I was in a cafe in Jerusalem when he was shot in Tel Aviv). I refused to attend his funeral, although I had attended Rabbi Meir Kahane's some years before.
Later I found out Rabin was apparently being pressured by the dark powers that be to continue to go against what he knew was wrong and that he resisted and was therefore MURDERED by them for coming to his senses.
I do not believe Yigal Amir murdered Rabin. ( I met Avishai Raviv several times - he's the government agent provacateur who goaded Raviv to murder Rabin). Amir is a patsy, the fall-guy, as is thoroughly expounded upon in Who Killed Yitzhak Rabin by Barry Chamish, his first book that broached the subject and clearly indicts the traitor and murderer Shimon Peres (whose Hebrew name appropriately means vulture).
I repeatedly condemn Peres as a kapo of compromise, a prostitute who serves his German-Jesuit EU masters, a traitor who has sold and is selling out Jews, Jerusalem and Israel and say as much in Beyond Babylon. I am on public record against his perfidy and continue to expose him. He was the Bolshevik in charge during my deportation, who was very much aware of an article published in Jerusalem where I mention the EU plans for Jerusalem's occupation.
The Israeli Secret Police (6 interrogated me) had a computer disk with my book on it and said many would read it/examine it during their investigation of me during their wild goose chase. I told them to make sure Peres read it....
That was a tactful way of saying I'm a Christian since I knew he personally knew Herbert W. Armstrong and the Worldwide Church of God, including the Plain Truth magazine. Mr. Armstrong had presented him with a gift of Steuben crystal before.
I was a volunteer at Kibbutz Ramat Yohanan at the time, in Northern Israel near Haifa. Just so happens Rabin had lived there for over a year in the late '50s.
I initially considered Rabin - born in Jerusalem - a traitor for surrendering too much to sworn Arab enemies who had not changed their goal of genocide, only their tactics; for going against clear security concerns he once expressed. (I was in a cafe in Jerusalem when he was shot in Tel Aviv). I refused to attend his funeral, although I had attended Rabbi Meir Kahane's some years before.
Later I found out Rabin was apparently being pressured by the dark powers that be to continue to go against what he knew was wrong and that he resisted and was therefore MURDERED by them for coming to his senses.
I do not believe Yigal Amir murdered Rabin. ( I met Avishai Raviv several times - he's the government agent provacateur who goaded Raviv to murder Rabin). Amir is a patsy, the fall-guy, as is thoroughly expounded upon in Who Killed Yitzhak Rabin by Barry Chamish, his first book that broached the subject and clearly indicts the traitor and murderer Shimon Peres (whose Hebrew name appropriately means vulture).
I repeatedly condemn Peres as a kapo of compromise, a prostitute who serves his German-Jesuit EU masters, a traitor who has sold and is selling out Jews, Jerusalem and Israel and say as much in Beyond Babylon. I am on public record against his perfidy and continue to expose him. He was the Bolshevik in charge during my deportation, who was very much aware of an article published in Jerusalem where I mention the EU plans for Jerusalem's occupation.
The Israeli Secret Police (6 interrogated me) had a computer disk with my book on it and said many would read it/examine it during their investigation of me during their wild goose chase. I told them to make sure Peres read it....
Edward Abington: political prostitute
"The American Diplomat in Arafat's Corner," published in The Jerusalem Report, came as no surprise to me. It was referring to Edward Abington, Jr., the United States' former consul general in Jerusalem who is now "guiding the Palestinians through the labyrinths of Washington. And his firm is being paid $2.25 million for his expertise."
Allow the following information to shed light on his less than faithful service to American taxpayers:
"Dear Congresswoman Kaptur:
Thank you for your valuable assistance in my pursuit of justice! It's wonderfully refreshing to see some public servants truly helping out their fellow Americans.
It's obvious from Mr. Abington, Jr.'s letter to you that he has strongly held political views that prefers the continued occupation of JUDAISM'S MOST HOLY SITE - the Temple Mount - by militant Muslims. Such radical views enable the Muslim extremists to continue to pose a threat to religious Jews and Christians who merely hope to pray on the site...
However historically or biblically inaccurate Mr. Abington, Jr's views are, I believe he is entitled to them. I do not believe his personal views ought to interfere with his public duty. It appears he has DELIBERATELY IGNORED every relevant FACT that PROVED my arrest amounted to political and religious PERSECUTION.
As honestly reported in The Jerusalem Post article he referred to, I wasn't interrogated...by 6 different SECRET SERVICEMEN about the TEMPLE MOUNT because of an "expired visa!" I charged Ms. Leech (his assistant) with complicity in their unjust actions against me for going along with their lie that my visa was expired and for turning a blind eye to their undemocratic ways. I'd given her a letter for Mr. Abington, Jr. to PROTEST MY POLITICAL ABUSE AND RELIGIOUS MISTREATMENT. Since he never bothered to respond, I'm not sure he even received it.
It was difficult to deal with Ms. Leech...since she was quite antagonistic, contending that Israel wanted to deport me because "you wanted to blow up the mosque." When I protested that simply was NOT TRUE, she angrily ordered her assistant, "Go see what he's charged with." He came back and said, "Visa violation." So she KNEW the real reason I was in jail was for being a member of the Temple Mount Faithful, but later went along with their LIE about my visa...
Mr. Abington, Jr. falsely accused me of being proud about my imprisonment. I'm not proud of it nor ashamed, but I do believe in making the most out of a bad situation...Why shouldn't I use my horrible experience to underscore and further the JUST CAUSE of the Temple Mount Faithful? How could anyone fail to understand this?...After all, it's the TEMPLE Mount, not the mosque mount!
Is it too much for an INNOCENT AMERICAN to expect his government to stand up for him? All I've requested from the beginning is for the Consul General to STRONGLY PROTEST my unjust imprisonment and deportation. They know what I say is the truth, but because of their hostile views, they're playing deaf, dumb and blind to the fact that I was a POLITICO-RELIGIOUS PRISONER.
Frankly, they're upset that I refused to go like a lamb to slaughter, but roared like a lion instead - exposing Peres' corruption and their complicity. I will continue to seek justice until it is found...."
Allow the following information to shed light on his less than faithful service to American taxpayers:
"Dear Congresswoman Kaptur:
Thank you for your valuable assistance in my pursuit of justice! It's wonderfully refreshing to see some public servants truly helping out their fellow Americans.
It's obvious from Mr. Abington, Jr.'s letter to you that he has strongly held political views that prefers the continued occupation of JUDAISM'S MOST HOLY SITE - the Temple Mount - by militant Muslims. Such radical views enable the Muslim extremists to continue to pose a threat to religious Jews and Christians who merely hope to pray on the site...
However historically or biblically inaccurate Mr. Abington, Jr's views are, I believe he is entitled to them. I do not believe his personal views ought to interfere with his public duty. It appears he has DELIBERATELY IGNORED every relevant FACT that PROVED my arrest amounted to political and religious PERSECUTION.
As honestly reported in The Jerusalem Post article he referred to, I wasn't interrogated...by 6 different SECRET SERVICEMEN about the TEMPLE MOUNT because of an "expired visa!" I charged Ms. Leech (his assistant) with complicity in their unjust actions against me for going along with their lie that my visa was expired and for turning a blind eye to their undemocratic ways. I'd given her a letter for Mr. Abington, Jr. to PROTEST MY POLITICAL ABUSE AND RELIGIOUS MISTREATMENT. Since he never bothered to respond, I'm not sure he even received it.
It was difficult to deal with Ms. Leech...since she was quite antagonistic, contending that Israel wanted to deport me because "you wanted to blow up the mosque." When I protested that simply was NOT TRUE, she angrily ordered her assistant, "Go see what he's charged with." He came back and said, "Visa violation." So she KNEW the real reason I was in jail was for being a member of the Temple Mount Faithful, but later went along with their LIE about my visa...
Mr. Abington, Jr. falsely accused me of being proud about my imprisonment. I'm not proud of it nor ashamed, but I do believe in making the most out of a bad situation...Why shouldn't I use my horrible experience to underscore and further the JUST CAUSE of the Temple Mount Faithful? How could anyone fail to understand this?...After all, it's the TEMPLE Mount, not the mosque mount!
Is it too much for an INNOCENT AMERICAN to expect his government to stand up for him? All I've requested from the beginning is for the Consul General to STRONGLY PROTEST my unjust imprisonment and deportation. They know what I say is the truth, but because of their hostile views, they're playing deaf, dumb and blind to the fact that I was a POLITICO-RELIGIOUS PRISONER.
Frankly, they're upset that I refused to go like a lamb to slaughter, but roared like a lion instead - exposing Peres' corruption and their complicity. I will continue to seek justice until it is found...."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)